Forces of Nature: Critic Reviews

86%
MovieWeb:   0 reviews
46%
RottenTomatoes:   50 reviews
  • Janet Maslin New York Times (Top Critic)
    The film shows off Ms. Bullock to amusing if overly frenetic advantage. It also leaves Mr. Affleck without enough of a Cary Grant aura to play his wimpier character with style.
    Full Review » 12 years ago
  • Justine Elias Village Voice (Top Critic)
    [Affleck is] too sturdy and sated. And you can't have screwball comedy if only one party desperately wants to screw.
    Full Review » 12 years ago
  • Roger Ebert Chicago Sun-Times (Top Critic)
    25
    A romantic shaggy dog story, a movie that leads us down the garden path of romance, only to abandon us by the compost heap of uplifting endings. And it's not even clever enough to give us the right happy ending.
    Full Review » 12 years ago
  • Gina Fattore Chicago Reader (Top Critic)
    A movie that obviously aspires to screwball status while trampling on the irrepressible female freedom that defines the genre.
    Full Review » 12 years ago
  • Joe Leydon Variety (Top Critic)
    An extremely enjoyable neo-screwball comedy about attractive opposites on the road.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Mary Elizabeth Williams Salon.com (Top Critic)
    At the center of every swirling storm is a place of placid inertia, safe and still -- and not very exciting. And it's where Affleck and Bullock spend most of their time, floating amiably but never doing enough to truly connect.
    Full Review » 12 years ago
  • Richard Corliss TIME Magazine (Top Critic)
    DreamWorks' first reprehensible fiasco.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Peter Travers Rolling Stone (Top Critic)
    The cinematic equivalent of Styrofoam: a weightless romantic comedy of synthetic feelings.
    Full Review » 11 years ago
  • Kenneth Turan Los Angeles Times (Top Critic)
    A most pleasant and diverting venture.
    Full Review » 11 years ago
  • Maitland McDonagh TV Guide's Movie Guide
    63
    Make no mistake: This slackly paced picture doesn't gel. But it so consistently undermines the pastel-pretty conventions that currently rule the genre that some sneaky admiration is in order.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Film4
    The humour is genial and both Affleck and Bullock are easy on the eye, but the film itself ends up being little more than a storm in a teacup.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Jim Lane Sacramento News & Review
    40
    Bullock seems a bit too level-headed for a screwball, and the affable Affleck has no real chemistry with her or Tierney.
    Full Review » 4 years ago
  • Dustin Putman DustinPutman.com
    50
    While far from a complete misfire, Forces of Nature remains simply too by-the-numbers to be particularly gratifying or worthwhile.
    Full Review » 4 years ago
  • Garth Franklin Dark Horizons
    All in all, it really depends on if you're a fan of the two leads. I am, so I liked it.
    Full Review » 4 years ago
  • Time Out
    A bumbling and typically charmless latter-day studio screwball comedy.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Robin Clifford Reeling Reviews
    50
    It has all been done before, and better.
    Full Review » 7 years ago
  • Dragan Antulov rec.arts.movies.reviews
    20
    For the most part this film is not particularly funny or entertaining. The plot is, of course, predictable.
    Full Review » 8 years ago
  • Susan Tavernetti Palo Alto Weekly
    63
    As soon as the co-stars become unlikely companions on a two-day trip to the South, a major problem crops up: no screen chemistry. They rarely click together, let alone sizzle.
    Full Review » 9 years ago
  • John R. McEwen Film Quips Online
    80
    Bullock seems to really be enjoying herself in this role, and Affleck is uncomfortable. I don't know whether this is because his role dictates it or if it's just a natural reaction, but it works.
    Full Review » 9 years ago
  • Margaret A. McGurk Cincinnati Enquirer
    63
    Sandra Bullock is the good news about Forces of Nature. Her natural charm dances off the screen with giddy abandon. Unfortunately, the movie lets her down.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • James Sanford Kalamazoo Gazette
    though Sandra Bullock and Ben Affleck generate a certain amount of goodwill... the comedy - like the airplane its central characters meet aboard - doesn't quite get off the ground.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Dwayne E. Leslie Boxoffice Magazine
    60
    The combination of Affleck's deadpan by-the-book persona with the spontaneity of Bullock's character sparks with convincing chemistry, their diverse personalities causing both to grow and bring to the surface what each is running away from or can't admit.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat Spirituality and Practice
    Relationships are always leaps of faith requiring only a courageous heart and a commitment to the beloved that goes beyond either rhyme or reason.
    Full Review » 10 years ago
  • Jim Chastain Norman Transcript
    Except for the continuous onslaught of disasters, some of which are genuinely funny, there is really not a whole lot going on here.
    Full Review » 11 years ago
  • Douglas Konecky culturevulture.net
    Forces of Nature isn't awful. It is just miscast. If Ben was being lured by someone more tempting, like Melanie Griffith in Wild Thing, say, it would have had more of an edge.
    Full Review » 11 years ago
Have you seen this Movie?
It's currently not in your ranks
Rank

Do you like Forces of Nature?

AVG. RATING 3.9 GREAT
Rate This
!
14 people have rated this Movie
  • 5 Star:
    1
    8%
  • 4 Star:
    8
    58%
  • 3 Star:
    3
    22%
  • 2 Star:
    2
    15%
  • 1 Star:
    0%
  • 0 Star:
    0%
  • User Lists9
  • Comments0
More Movies Like This
Head Over Heels Lost & Found Saving Silverman A Midsummer Night's Dream Primary Colors Meet the Parents
Recent Activity
Fans of this Movie (0)
No one is a fan yet. Become a Fan.