Doogal: Critic Reviews

10%
MovieWeb:   2 reviews
8%
RottenTomatoes:   49 reviews
  • Scott Brown Entertainment Weekly (Top Critic)
    0
    Where is it written that 4-year-olds don't deserve a good story, decent characters, and a modicum of coherence?
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Ned Martel New York Times (Top Critic)
    20
    In Doogal, setting the world right again involves a badly paced quest for three diamonds, assorted jokes that don't land, and a daringly incoherent climactic confrontation.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Louise Kennedy Boston Globe (Top Critic)
    25
    If we keep saying, 'Yeah, it's lousy, but there's so much worse stuff out there,' and we keep sighing, rolling our eyes, and going anyway, we'll keep getting slapdash, manipulative product like this. Kids deserve better. So do dogs.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Jami Bernard New York Daily News (Top Critic)
    38
    A dreadful animated movie stuffed with bad puns and little internal logic.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Michael Phillips Chicago Tribune (Top Critic)
    25
    Eighty-five minutes you'll never get back.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Lou Lumenick New York Post (Top Critic)
    25
    Doogal is an exceeding lame animated feature about a bunch of kids trapped on a magical carousel -- but it's adults forced to sit through this slow-moving, G-rated Lord of the Rings knockoff who will be begging for mercy.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Roger Moore Orlando Sentinel (Top Critic)
    20
    It's easily the worst kid's movie since Spy Kids 3-D, a confusing blur of a magical quest based on an ancient British stop-motion animation TV show.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Peter Howell Toronto Star (Top Critic)
    25
    In attempting to turn a tiny Anglo-Franco amusement into a full-blown Yankee extravaganza, The Weinstein Co. has managed to choke every last bit of charm out of the characters and their setting, no mean feat for a show this enchanting.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Jason Anderson Globe and Mail (Top Critic)
    50
    The slapdash dialogue and smug vocal talent detract from the visual appeal of the most energetic sequences (like a raucous train chase) and what's left of Danot's designs.
    Full Review » 4 years ago
  • Frank Scheck Hollywood Reporter (Top Critic)
    The key frame animation, based on three-dimensional models, is rudimentary, with none of the characters proving visually arresting.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Christy Lemire Associated Press (Top Critic)
    The laziest, most disheartening kind of animated children's film.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Felix Vasquez Jr. Cinema Crazed
    25
    A sheer waste of priceless talent.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Tom Meek Boston Phoenix
    50
    Too often those behind the slick 3-D animation spectacles aimed at children imbue them with too much adult humor.
    Full Review » 3 years ago
  • Frank Lovece Film Journal International
    A delight for very young children and any parent who'll get the Attorney General joke of "Geneva Convention? I don't care if it's a Star Trek convention!"
    Full Review » 5 years ago
  • Wesley Lovell Oscar Guy
    25
    A jumble of bad movie cliches strung together into an overly simplistic tale of a pooch who gets in trouble over candy.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Jim Lane Sacramento News & Review
    20
    For U.S. audiences the voices have been dubbed by the likes of Whoopi Goldberg, Jon Stewart, Chevy Chase and Jimmy Fallon, who add nothing; in fact, the movie drags them down with it.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Christopher Null Filmcritic.com
    30
    I can only assume that half the movie got lost in translation, and that's how we ended up with the bald mess we have today.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • John Beifuss Commercial Appeal (Memphis, TN)
    0
    The characters (a snail, a cow, a rock-n-roll rabbit, a train, a wooden soldier) and voice actors (Whoopi Goldberg, Judi Dench, Chevy Chase) seem chosen at random...
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Pam Grady Reel.com
    25
    Doogal is definitely a dog.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Steve Davis Austin Chronicle
    10
    A wretched experience from start to finish.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Cynthia Fuchs PopMatters
    Unoriginal and only sometimes cute, DOOGAL is mostly harmless, but dull.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Ken Hanke Mountain Xpress (Asheville, NC)
    20
    This isn't dumbing-down. This is a full-scale lobotomy.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Kit Bowen Hollywood.com
    25
    Doogal tries to be part of the hip CGI-animated club, with all the pop-culture references and feel-good messages. But unfortunately, it fails on all levels.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Nathan Rabin AV Club
    9
    Hungering for more references to the 'Wassup' commercials, Dr. Phil, 'Bling Bling,' The Lord Of The Rings, MC Hammer, or The Matrix? Don't worry, Doogal contains nods to all of these.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
  • Nell Minow Movie Mom at Yahoo! Movies
    42
    The animation has the low-budget CGI look of meticulous textures but movement as jerky and unpersuasive as Davey and Goliath.
    Full Review » 6 years ago
Have you seen this Movie?
It's currently not in your ranks
Rank

Do you like Doogal?

AVG. RATING 0.9 HORRIBLE
Rate This
!
10 people have rated this Movie
  • 5 Star:
    0%
  • 4 Star:
    0%
  • 3 Star:
    1
    10%
  • 2 Star:
    0%
  • 1 Star:
    1
    10%
  • 8
    80%
  • User Lists13
  • Comments0
More Movies Like This
Everyone's Hero Yu-Gi-Oh! The Movie Space Chimps Arthur Christmas Happily N'Ever After Flushed Away
Recent Activity
Fans of this Movie (0)
No one is a fan yet. Become a Fan.