Disney's a Christmas Carol: Review By Julian Roman
All style and no substance, Disney’s A Christmas Carol is a yawn inducing retread of a tired fable.
-
OVERALL3.0WORTHY
-
Story
-
Acting
-
Directing
-
Visuals
The story should be familiar to everyone in the western world. In Victorian London, Jacob Marley dies, leaving his partner – Ebenezer Scrooge in charge of the business. A miserly cheapskate, Scrooge scowls at the very thought of Christmas. He hoards every penny, ignoring any kindness from his nephew (Colin Firth) and dutiful assistant, Bob Cratchit (Gary Oldman). Scrooge’s curmudgeonly ways are tested when he his visited by the shackled ghost of Jacob Marley; who has been doomed to an eternity of penance for his misdeeds. He informs Scrooge that he will be visited that night by three spirits, the ghosts of Christmas past, present, and future. They will show Scrooge the true meaning of Christmas, and give him one last chance to save his soul from Marley’s fate.
Robert Zemeckis has pioneered motion capture, 3D animation. He’s got three under his belt – The Polar Express, Beowulf, and now, A Christmas Carol. All of these movies are technically superb, unquestionably so, but fail as a whole. Why? Because they are poorly acted, have weak plots, and are generally unremarkable beyond the visual effects. This is very disappointing, especially from the director that gave us Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Back to the Future. Zemeckis has become too enamored with the technology. Filmmaking is about storytelling. He is a master storyteller and needs to get back to his roots.
I am an unabashed fan of Jim Carrey. He is the Jerry Louis of our day, a genius actor who is always overlooked for greatness. I expected A Christmas Carol to be the perfect vehicle for his comedic talent. Playing Scrooge, the ghosts, hilarity ensues! Not really, not even close. Carrey in this film is as rote as we’ve ever seen him. Unremarkable in every way, any actor could have played these parts as Carrey does. And I don’t mean the bumbling Ace Ventura-esque Carrey; I’m talking about the distinct comedic flavor that Carrey can add to a role - as in Liar, Liar or the vastly underappreciated Yes Man.
Special effects in the twenty-first century have become so good; I can watch this film and not be impressed at all. I’ve just seen so many films like this in the past few years. Compared to Jim Cameron’s “Avatar”, A Christmas Carol looks like old news. I appreciate that motion capture allows versatility to explore the imagination, but cartoons have been doing this from the very beginning. The 3D aspect should be impressive in the IMAX format. That’s the only way I would see this film in theater.
Do you like this review?
Julian Roman's Reviews (138)
No TV reviews yet.
No DVD reviews yet.

Comments (6)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
IlikePie202
@BloodandGuts just because you disagree with him doesnt mean you have to take a sh*t on him
1 year agoby @Ilikepie202Flag
RavenX5 God of Light
im sorry, but i have to disagree on this review, yes the story is tired but in this version it deelves deeper to how Scrooge's life
turned upside down and it has a lot of depressing moments and Jim Carrey's performance as the character really nailed it to the ground and he also did the voices for the ghosts as well.P.S.,
it James Cameron, not Jim
2 years agoby @hackx9Flag
BloodandGuts
Horrible review. i went to see it in 3d and it was great. jim carrey was excellent. the animation style and effects were amazing. Get out of here!!!
2 years agoby @bloodandgutsFlag
Julian Roman
Hey, I hope you guys like it. I was bored silly:)
2 years agoby @julianromanFlag
ed_wood
Good review, but from what I've seen this looks great. I doubt I will be disappointed.
2 years agoby @ed-woodFlag
ZanyZap
Good review; on par with my preemptive assumptions. I'll still see it, solely based on Jim Carrey, regardless of his so-called lifeless and ordinary performance.
And if you didn't see it in the theater, where did you watch it?
2 years agoby @zanyzapFlag