City Of God: Review By Dan
You need more than guts to be a good gangster, you need ideas.
-
OVERALL4.5SUPERB
-
Story
-
Acting
-
Directing
-
Visuals
Told from the perspective of and narrated by in Portuguese by 'Rocket' (Alexandre Rodrigues), and beginning with what I found to be an amusing scene of a chicken watching other chickens be butchered in a 'favela' (a ghetto, basically, of Rio), it literally gets that look on its face of "screw this, I'm getting outta here!", which leads to a gang of kidults (a term I made up for children who think they are adults), surprisingly armed with weapons, chasing the chicken around the the favela until it runs into Rocket, who is between the gang and police as he tries to grab the chicken. The film then backtracks to the 60's, and Rocket introduces us to the "Tender Trio", which involves his brother Goose, Shaggy, and Clipper, local hooligans who are popular with people for acting like the Robin Hoods of their favela by holding up gas trucks that come through their town. On the suggestion of Li'l Dice (played ruthlessly by both child actor Douglas Silva, and Leandro Firmino da Hora), they decide to hold up a motel/whor*house, and from the aftermath of this go separate paths in life, feeling that the heist was too intense for them. But through this event, Li'l Dice is transformed into the monster he is, as he brutally gunned down most of the motel 'patrons', disturbingly shown. The film then fast forwards several years, as Li'l Dice and Rocket are young adults, with Dice in fairly firm control of most of the criminal aspects of Rio at this point by his brutal, no nonsense way of dominating others to his will (with a nod to Godfather, by knocking off virtually all of his competition), and Rocket aspiring to be a photographer/journalist, chronicling Dice's gang activities. Whew. Writing all that makes the film seem complicated, but it's actually very straightforward, and is not without its irony in the end (solidifying its status for me).
What the film benefits from most is its mostly unknown cast, besides a young Alice Braga (known more for the recent Predators, but bringing a lot more warmth and depth to her role here). A lot of the actors and actresses in the film were literally picked off the streets of Rio to be in the movie, which in turn lends a sense of realism that cannot be gained by well known and conditioned actors. Many times in the movie it seems as if the director just allowed them to be themselves. The only American film I can think of comparing this to would be KIDS (Rosario Dawson's first film, and also featured a cast predominately of kids right off the mean streets of New York City), by Larry Clark. Both films get into the nitty gritty of inner city kidult life, and make zero apologies for the way they behave. They are allowed to breathe and tell their stories, however violent and politically incorrect they may be. For that, they have both tremendous respect from me, and my revulsion. While I can appreciate this realism, it also bothers me at a core level that there are children in this world that do truly behave in these fashions. You can call it whatever you like, products of their environment, just plain evil, but it is what it is, and neither film apologize nor glamorize these lifestyles, they just simply tell them.
And while City of God certainly has its fill of violence (this is NOT a movie for children to see, even though it features mostly children/young adults), it has its sense of humor, between the chicken scene I already referenced, and a way for bananas to sp*ce up your sex life, among others. This contrast to the drab world they live in keeps City of God from becoming overly depressing with its subject material, also elevating it above other crime sagas. I don't mind a serious movie, I expect it from a film like this, but its tendency to make you laugh between its griminess keeps it on a lighter note at the right moments.
Like the city itself, City of God is an intensely vibrantly colored film, with its rich yellows, greens, reds, and blues, between the architecture, clothes they wear, and the environment. While Li'l Dice makes his mark in his world, everything looks brilliant and earthy, as I would expect it to look being filmed in Brazil itself. And like a very select amount of movies, I don't mind the hand held camera work done throughout most of it, as it is panned out enough for me to see everything, and refrains for the most part from the overly shaking in an attempt to make things seem more dramatic.
With a script that doesn't even seem like it is even there because of everyone acting so naturally, a short run time for a crime epic (at 2 hours, 9 minutes), and scathing, sharp dialogue sometimes filled with expletives (although being in Portuguese, may not shock those that don't understand the language), City of God is an explosive, sun drenched foreign film that should be viewed by anyone that enjoys films with actual substance, subtleties, and criminal brutality. This is the seedy side of life, brilliantly told by our protagonist with humor at times, and one of my favorite films of the '00 decade.
With a follow up film and series that isn't directly related to City of God, City of Men, by the same creators (and some of the same actors), also showcased the favelas of Rio, and is also as violent and no nonsense as this was. I would certainly recommend both for your viewing pleasure. I hope that you've enjoyed my review!
(All words, ideas are mine. Plagiarizers are douchbags, don't be one. Any similarities to other reviews is complete coincidence).

Comments (34)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
Dan
@CBF Dude! Guest appearance! Nice to see you haven't died on us :)
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
CBF
You mentioned Casino and Godfather II. Need I say more? Excellente.
2 years agoby @comicbookfanFlag
IlikePie202
@TheCultClassics what the hell?
@Supes great review, I'm yet to see this.
2 years agoby @Ilikepie202Flag
Dan
Oh cool, they changed the thumbs up, thumbs down thing. We can see how many thumbs down something gets now! Awesome.
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
Jay.A.Ottley
HAHA @Dave your comment made me laugh despite I agree with you, @Jake you definately need to check this film out. :)
2 years agoby @jayaottleyFlag
Jay.A.Ottley
EPIC REVIEW @SUPES, love this film, one of my favourite true gangster films of all time
I'm also officially top-notch rating you for mentioning City Of Men & the follow-up series.
2 years agoby @jayaottleyFlag
Daveactor7
@Jake dude you need to catch up lol
2 years agoby @daveactor7Flag
Jakn
I never heard of this movie before, but very nice review my friend. :)
2 years agoby @jaknFlag
TheDarkJoker
Great review
2 years agoby @TheDarkJokerFlag
Daveactor7
@Supes oh alright. Do that
2 years agoby @daveactor7Flag
Dan
Meaning not every review is going to be perfect in everyone's eyes. You, @Narrator, @moviegeek have pointed out weaknesses (well, the 2 of them with more specificity) in this review. I'll keep these things in mind. My next one will be tighter focused, less plot details.
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
Daveactor7
@Supes what do you mean?
2 years agoby @daveactor7Flag
Dan
Well considering my other reviews and how much people have liked them, I think I'm allowed for one or two that aren't knock you on your feet good, @Dave :P
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
Daveactor7
Not your best, but certainly a great review. The thing I enjoyed the most about this film was the cinematography. Nice job man :)
2 years agoby @daveactor7Flag
Dan
@Narrator Thanks man! Now stop reading my reviews and get to work on your own! :P
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
the Narrator
Fan-f*cking-tastic review Supes. Dare I say, you're third best yet, next to your Beauty and the Beast review? As @Diaigma pointed out, you did indeed drop us into the story and heart of the film by the first paragraph or so, and while never getting preachy, you did insert a few paragraphs about your view of the kidults (copyright that sucker) in places such as this. Well done. What kept this from possibly being your best review was perhaps the way you wrote the plot synopsis. It did seem a bit mushed after a while, but that's more than understandable. I especially liked your list of other crime epics, listed in the beginning for comparisons. I find myself agreeing with you on all those films as well.
Sad thing is, I spend more time reading your reviews (not counting other users writings) than I do writing ones of my own. :P
On one of those critics lists, this film was next to Return of the King in the top 3 or 4 of the decade if I remember correctly, which is why I wanted to see it so bad. After this great review, it's definitely going on my Netflix queue.
2 years agoby @narratorFlag
slysnide
I remember seeing trailers for this. Glad to finally read an opinion on it. I'll have to see this one soon.
2 years agoby @slysnideFlag
Dan
You see? Many people haven't seen it, and I'm shedding the light on it :)
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
SCREENWRITER
Nice lengthy review, my friend. I've never seen this so I'll have to add it on Netflix :D
2 years agoby @the-screenwriterFlag
Worth5Bucks
This is a great review! I definitely want to see this film now. I'm going to add it to my list. and awe man, looks like youre going to beat me to review E.T. I already started mine but I have three films to review in between, actually i had one paragraph left in my black swan review when I changed computers and the file i saved on my flash drive was corrupt. So i had to start all over.
2 years agoby @mattbierwagenFlag
Big Mike
i've been wanting to see this for a while..
2 years agoby @A-Exceptional-CriticFlag
thedude-abides
This wasn't my favorite movie, but I really liked the way the story is laid out- with each character backstory progressing the story forward. Another solid review.
2 years agoby @thedude-abidesFlag
Dan
@Wichy It's a good one :)
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
Wichy
Another great review. I have never watched this one but I surely will now :D
2 years agoby @wichitagalzlFlag
Dan
You are like the deep philosopher of the website, I appreciate that about you, @Summit10.
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
Dan
Nicely worded, @Summit10. It's like a missing paragraph from my review or something lol :P
And thanks, dude. Yes, more films like this need exposure to the world. It's not an easy watch, but it's a watch people should have.
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
Summit10
it is so convuluting how children are growing up today, more so on these given circ*mstances and places. like ejk said for Blood Diamond and another film Lord of War. This is their way of living with or without clear comprehension of repurcusssions. The film exudes real life situations and its surreal underpinnings on violence and angst. I believe we should or we can put more emphasis on films such as this to make our viewpoints be heard to think deeper not for the accolades of friends but for the world to see what is going on, films are depicted as mediums to entertain, make a statement and inform, share what is happening around us.
Really fine work Supes!!! more to come :)
2 years agoby @summit10Flag
Diaigma
You're welcome. And yeah, I know that all too well. Writer's constipation is worse than writer's block, in my opinion :P
2 years agoby @diaigmaFlag
Dan
@D Thanks, man, that means a LOT to me, knowing that you're a writer, yourself. This one was easy to write about, all the words just flew out of me. I dunno why I can do that sometimes, and yet at other times I can't form a single sentence.
2 years agoby @dan1Flag
Diaigma
@Supes - you've mastered the ability to draw me in with your opening paragraphs lately, something that many would-be writers have a hard time figuring out. Colorful, descriptive, and inventive (kidults . . . love it!). Jolly good show, good sir! :)
2 years agoby @diaigmaFlag