Chinatown: Review By SCREENWRITER
One of the few films in cinema that I consider to be complete perfection...
-
OVERALL5.0SUPERB
-
Story
-
Acting
-
Directing
-
Visuals
The movie focuses on private investigator J.J. Gittes following around a man named Mulwray, whose wife believes he is cheating on her. After taking photos for the truth, they make their way to the newspaper, getting Gittes a bad reputation. Unknowingly become a pawn in a smear game, Gittes discovers it wasn't Mulwray's wife who hired him in the first place and when Mulwray shows up dead, Gittes finds himself involved in one of the most interesting cases of his career that he can't stay away from even if it means risking his life. The story hear, like an Mystery film, offers plenty of twists and turns to catch the eyes of the viewer, and it in fact, is done marvellously.
Even though the film may be entitled "Chinatown", it actually has very little to do with the Chinse-American quarter of Los Angeles. The reason the film has the name is because Gittes is a former officer from Chinatown.
Director Roman Polanski and screenwriter Robert Towne have intended this film as a homage to Film-noir, but there are some differences from the usual type. Instead of being filmed in black and white, "Chinatown" comes in full colour. Polanski, even though using the genre in colour, brings the Film-noir look to a whole new level with beauteous shots of 1930's LA and fantastic views of the city. Towne's script, as mysterious as the genre can get, presents a devious little story that'll keep you entertained all the way to the shocking conclusion.
Classic Film-noir films were often filmed very dark and moody being filmed mostly at night. With "Chinatown" it's the complete opposite where most of the film takes place during the day in sunny-hot LA. The literal translation of "Film-noir" is of course, "black film". This movie, however, is set-up with light text but very dark morally. The plot takes in not only financial corruption but also murder and insect as well. The moral darkness that lies at the heart of "Chinatown" isn't shown in darkness but is presented thoughtfully, if that makes any sense.
Jack Nicholson, being my favorite actor of the 1970's for classic-films like "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" and "Five Easy Pieces", and of course this. His character Gittes is one of the best screened performances by him. His awkward character seeing that justice should be done right is memorizing. Gittes would have to be one of my most favorite characters in movie cinema, not just because he's a fantastic private eye but because of his appearance. He may look like just a suit and tie from the poster but the character has a bandage covered over his slit nose for most of the film that shows the true grit behind his character. While Fay Dunaway gives an excellent performance as the wife of Mulwray, the best performance from the film comes from John Hutson, more known for a director than actor. Hutson plays Noah Cross, the father of Mulwray's wife and one of the main villains of the film. Though Cross seems like a sinister man, his character stays calm and civilized..which makes him all the more dangerous. It's a real shame that out of the eleven Academy Awards this film was up for Hutson wasn't nominated for Best Supporting Actor. I would have liked that.
With a fantastic script, beautiful direction, rock-solid performances, and a excellent pace, "Chinatown" stands as one of my most treasured films of all time. Nowadays, the genre "Film-noir" may seem distant but it's the classics like these that keep em' alive today. If you haven't yet seen "Chinatown" you best get on it because its one of the greatest mystery-films to date.
Thanks for the read!
-Screeny

Comments (15)
To leave a comment, please sign in or use
Facebook or Twitter
SCREENWRITER
@Slysnie: LA Confidential is fantastic!! But, I see the points you've made. I'll have to watch this again to witness them.
1 year agoby @the-screenwriterFlag
slysnide
Oh. Yeah there wasn't enough going on in the preceding two hours to get excited about, or intrigued. Barely enough time given to figure any given mystery out on our own before Jake answers the questions himself in a very Maltese Falcon sorta way. Except for the love child thing right before the climax. Shocking for '74? Yes. Yet only strange today. Not enough from the characters. I did however like Polanski's cameo as the knife guy. But my favorite all time cop film with all the intrigue and depth was "LA Confidential."
1 year agoby @slysnideFlag
Dan
In that you showed how unrealistic it was, and how naive the protagonist was. I hate when characters make stupid mistakes like the one you described.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
slysnide
In what sense?
1 year agoby @slysnideFlag
Dan
@Sly just pwned the movie Chinatown.
1 year agoby @dan1Flag
slysnide
Let's see, for me at least, the intrigue didn't pick up till the last ten minutes of the film. Not enough depth, nor subplots to keep interested as you're finding out everything as Jake is, slowly hittin' things one after another. Then he manages to make the biggest most avoidable mistake ever, being asking Noah for another visit. Given his susp*ciouns, he should've assumed that everything Noah told him at the ranch was a lie, and that to even be asked to speak with him again, that Noah would obviously know what Jake suspects as he wants to see him again. Thus, why did Jake meet with Noah without so much as a buddy for backup? Or somewhere more public. Hell he was chased down on the ranch and that's susp*cious enough already, but to again wanna see the guy given his complete answers, then Jake should've known Noah would come packin. Way too obvious to overlook, especially obvious without other subplots or depth to distract/entice the viewer. Then the ending. So what if it's Chinatown? He shot her dead in cold blood with dozens of witnesses. He can't get away with that. Even with his bad rep at the police station, Jake still would score points for taking in a killer. Especially with so many legit witnesses on his side. So given all that, I was expecting more from this film. Saw it in my "AFM" course, and my intructor somewhat agreed with my angle in the essay I had to write on it, of which I posted as a forum under the film's page here titled "Are Cliches Too Much?"
1 year agoby @slysnideFlag
SCREENWRITER
@Slysnide: Like what? and thanks :D
1 year agoby @the-screenwriterFlag
slysnide
Eh, I have my caveats with it. Great review though.
1 year agoby @slysnideFlag
SCREENWRITER
@The Narrator: Ha, yes, there's a way to put it. :D Thanks man.
1 year agoby @the-screenwriterFlag
The Narrator: The Better Man
One of the greatest neo-noir films ever. I think that's the word you were looking for. Lol. Great review Screeny. I need to re-watch this some time soon.
1 year agoby @narratorFlag
SCREENWRITER
Thanks, guys.
@Diaigma: Yes, a rant sounds good. Seeing The Mechanic tonight and I'm not behind the idea of it being remade so expect something from that. haha
1 year agoby @the-screenwriterFlag
Daveactor7
Great review sir! I loved this film!
1 year agoby @daveactor7Flag
Worth5Bucks
I need to see this movie. great review!
1 year agoby @mattbierwagenFlag
IlikePie202
Damnit, still haven't seen the movie. great review
1 year agoby @Ilikepie202Flag
Diaigma
All right. I gotta know. When do you have the time to pump out all of these awesome reviews? It's inconceivable! :D
Good one, @Screeny - totally behind your opinion of this.
(You've done three 5 stars in a row. How about rant, now? :P )
1 year agoby @diaigmaFlag