A Night At The Roxbury: Critic Reviews

The director, John Fortenberry, whose background is in television, has probably done the best that can be done with characters who were never meant to speak.

A Night at the Roxbury probably never had a shot at being funny anyway, but I don't think it planned to be pathetic. It's the first comedy I've attended where you feel that to laugh would be cruel to the characters.

More schmaltzy than funny.

An amiable, if flyweight, diversion.

Anyone who is more than momentarily diverted by this motion picture has such a radically different idea from me of what constitutes 'entertainment' that we may never agree on anything.

It would take far better writing than Kattan, Ferrell and Steve Koren can muster to make it less than an ordeal.

based on this, i did not expect ferrell to make it big

Not exactly highbrow stuff, but who ever said a comedy needed to be highbrow to enjoy?

Shun this witless showcase for the Saturday Night Live double act of Ferrell and Kattan.

Depois de um tempo, parei de prestar atencao na historia (hein?) e me concentrei na boa trilha sonora. Alem disso, o filme e curto o bastante para nao se tornar intoleravel.

relentlessly silly

One thin joke stretched over 80-some tiring minutes.

Crap!!!!!

Low-impact fun for the indiscriminate viewer.

making a skit 30 times as long does not necessarily mean you've made it 30 times as funny; despite scattered laughs 'Roxbury' feels overextended...

The Butabi brothers are uber-losers, and therein lies the joke. Between spoofs on nightclubs, personal trainers and hitting on hotties, the brothers bob their heads to the beat and make complete fools of themselves.

Though the sketches featuring the two head-bopping losers have sometimes been hysterical on the show, the premise just doesn't translate to a feature film.

Its forced slapstick egregiously mugs the audience for laughs.