10,000 B.C.: Comments

Jussta

a BIG dissapointment

3 years agoby @jusstaFlag

the_tall_guy

I liked the movie in a way. It was different, but not a good kind of different. I was disappointed overall. The director could have done better. I guess my hopes were high after seeing Independence Day, and expecting that.

4 years agoby @the-tall-guyFlag

Nyfresh

very bad movie, i was high and i still couldnt watch it and ill watch anything high

5 years agoby @leo16Flag

Saul

Worst movie I've seen in years...what a huge dissapointment, luckly it was so bad we had a good laugh watching it. The whole audience had (about 30 people in the cinema; all laughing), so we had a good timeXD

5 years agoby @saulFlag

prakash_17

i just went and watched the movie just now on the first show.........and to all the regular moviegoers out there this isa movie that you don't want to miss......the movie is not to draggy and it is a simple story that is told in a great way by the director,Roland Emmerich.......you have to watch the movie to experience it.......that all i got to say about the movie........enjoy the movie guyz!!!!!!!......

5 years agoby @prakash-17Flag

denton

this movie looks great

5 years agoby @dentonFlag

SaintCharles

that charliejames guy's life must really suck being offended all the time

5 years agoby @saintcharlesFlag

prakash_17

da trailer really looks promising.........

5 years agoby @prakash-17Flag

THE JOKER

this looks like it is going to be really good

5 years agoby @mcleve02Flag

CharlieJames

See Mr.Charlie's World@blogspot.com
10,000 BC Racist Historical Crap

Director Roland Emmerich should be ashamed of himself.

When will we get it right and stop putting this racist crap on the movie screens? Any historian will tell you that Egypt ( its part of Africa not the middle East) and the Tigris/Euphrates Valley has well-developed civilizations, even 12,000 years ago. And yes African or descendants of Ham first settled both of those societies. That's why the original settlers in Mesopotamia were called the black-headed people.

We have used the image of white people in furs, i.e. cavemen and women, as the image of early man so much that its hard to contemplate that African and Asian people were never cave people and yet their lineage is much older than Caucasians.

We have an ongoing series about caveman where they boast of giving man the wheel and fire as they none of these things happened before whites appeared. Bull

Our information about the history of man was put together during the early part of this century when white anthropologist were convinced that Africa and African people were insignificant. Even in this picture there does not appear to be any Black people other than faces in the crowd.

The movie says that this was the first hero and implies that this was the beginning of man's rise to civilization. Then it leads to pyramids and still no Black or brown faces.

Caucasians had nothing to do with pyramids and nor were their any proof of any Caucasian presence in the early history of anywhere pyramids can be found.

I don't care about the Saber tooth tigers but I am tired of this racist twisting of history that refuses to acknowledge that Europe was actually the last continent to get civilization in 50 BC when Julius Caesar and the Romans invaded. Most of the Roman army was North Africans and blacker than I am because most of the original Roman territory was North Africa. Remember Hannibal a Black General of Carthage. The barbarians were originally the white tribes of Europe.

Every scientist will tell you that man was in Africa first and was Black. Yet we still use the old anthropology scales that show the rise of man from ape to Homo sapiens and the Homo sapiens is always a white man in furs. My kids are very confused when I show them the truth.

Why is all they can say? Why?

5 years agoby @charliejamesFlag