Harrison Ford Says He May Return for 'Blade Runner' Sequel

The actor acknowledges rumors that he did not get along with director Ridley Scott on the original. He wants to put that in the past and move on.

Harrison Ford may return as Deckard for the Blade Runner sequel
Harrison Ford may return as Deckard for the Blade Runner sequel
Over the past few years, we've heard a number of conflicting reports regarding Harrison Ford's involvement in the Blade Runner Sequel.

Back in October 2012, it was rumored that the actor was in talks to return as Rick Deckard from the original 1982 classic Blade Runner. Producer Andrew A. Kosove shot down those rumors just a few days later. But then, director Ridley Scott turned right around and revealed he was quite open to the actor returning.

While promoting his upcoming sci-fi thriller Ender's Game, Harrison Ford himself has now revealed that he has been talking with Ridley Scott about coming back as Rick Deckard.

"Yeah, we've been chatting about it."

Despite being considered one of the great classics in the sci-fi genre, its long been known that the original Blade Runner was a very troubled production. Harrison Ford and Ridley Scott didn't see eye to eye on what the movie was supposed to be, and there was a lot of on set turmoil between them. The actor has remained tight-lipped about these issues, never acknowledging them in the press. For the first time, Ford has admitted that he does not look back on that time fondly, but that he is willing to leave it in the past, and that he is excited to work with Ridley Scott once again.

"I remember [the first film] with 'complication'. But I'm not there to generate nostalgic moments, I'm there to do a job of work. I quite understand that everyone has an ambition when they come into a film and everyone's ambition may not be so focused on the same thing.

I truly admire Ridley as a man and as a director, and I would be very happy to engage again with him in the further telling of this story."

Ford also commented on the notorious voice-over when asked if it would return in the sequel, since it was later removed in the director's cut of the original. He joked about it at first, and then revealed it was part of the issue with the first one, and it was actually something he and the director agreed on.

"I'm not capable of losing my voice. Cutting out my tonsils...Cutting out my vocal cords...That was a big part of the issue. I didn't think it was necessary. It wasn't part of it. And Ridley didn't think it was necessary. That was something that came up from the studio."

We reported in May that Michael Green (Green Lantern) signed on to work on the script. Original Blade Runner writer Hampton Fancher came aboard to write the screenplay in May 2012, but it isn't known if Michael Green is working from Hampton Fancher's draft, or starting from scratch.

Director Ridley Scott also revealed last May that the story will feature a female protagonist. Andrew A. Kosove and Broderick Johnson are producing, although it isn't known when production may begin.

The original Blade Runner, which was released in 1982, followed Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a blade runner in the year 2019 who is tasked with eliminating human-like androids known as replicants.

You can watch the original video interview in the following embed.

Untitled Blade Runner Project comes to theaters in 2014.

Blade Runner was released June 25th, 1982 and stars Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, Sean Young, Edward James Olmos, M. Emmet Walsh, Daryl Hannah, William Sanderson, Brion James. The film is directed by Ridley Scott.



Sources: IGN

Share this story yet?

291 24 4 0 0

RELATED STORIES

BEST OF THE WEB

Comments (13)

  1. Sean

    @felipe-11 Actually, I usually end up being unsatisfied with a movie not because I didn't like it (which I usually like the movies that I know I want to see, before and after I see them), but because of their running time being too short, if it is in fact too short. And too short in my opinion is like anything that is under 2 hours long.

    1 year agoby @themoviefanaticFlag

  2. Replicant

    @themoviefanatic I get what you're saying, but if a movie left you unsatisfied because you thought it was short, then it just really left you unsatisfied because it wasn't a great movie. Length wasn't the problem, it was content.

    It's a total Michael Bay mentality; the man makes his movies 3 hours long (Pearl Harbor, TF 2-3) because he thinks length equals satisfaction (or epicness) when in reality his movies are completely unsatisfying because they lack character development and good plots.

    1 year agoby @felipe-11Flag

  3. Sean

    @felipe-11 I see what you're saying but I usually figure that the longer the movie is, the better, because then we get to see enough from the movie, with leaving the theater unsatisfied with the movie because of being too short or even seeming to be too short.

    1 year agoby @themoviefanaticFlag

  4. Replicant

    @themoviefanatic And do you really think the length of a movie has anything to do with it's quality? Gravity is 90 minutes long and is probably the best reviewed movie of the year.

    1 year agoby @felipe-11Flag

  5. Sean

    @felipe-11 Actually, It's 117 minutes long, so it's 3 minutes less then 2 hours long.

    1 year agoby @themoviefanaticFlag

  6. David garcia

    Keep it different from the original film, that takes a different course.

    1 year agoby @David-garcia-67788063Flag

  7. Writer220

    what's funny is that this would be a franchise once the new film is done. He's Indiana, Han Solo and now he's taking on another old role of his. If Harrison isn't careful he might end up doing one more old character whatever it is.

    1 year agoby @writer220Flag

  8. Fry_3000

    Please please please. Be awesome if they continue, as long as they keep Harrison as the age he is like they did for Indy.

    1 year agoby @Fry-3000Flag

  9. Replicant

    @themoviefanatic The first one is 2 hours long...

    1 year agoby @felipe-11Flag

  10. Sean

    I'm looking forward to seeing a Blade Running sequel eventually, but I hope it'll be over 2 hours long unlike the first Blade Runner movie.

    1 year agoby @themoviefanaticFlag

  11. skywise

    AS much as I would love to see a BR sequel, they are about 20 years too late.

    1 year agoby @skywiseFlag

  12. CelluloidDreams

    All about the money!!!

    1 year agoby @2movieguysFlag