‘Clash of the Titans 2’ Signs Jonathan Liebesman to Direct

Dan Mazeau and David Johnson are writing the script for the Warner Bros. sequel.

Jonathan Liebesman directing Clash of the Titans 2 for Warner Bros.
Jonathan Liebesman directing Clash of the Titans 2 for Warner Bros.
It's official.

Battle: Los Angeles director Jonathan Liebesman has signed on to direct Warner Bros. upcoming sequel Clash of the Titans 2, according to Heat Vision Blog.

We reported back in June that Jonathan Liebesman was one of the directors being considered to replace original Clash of the Titans director Louis Leterrier. The site reports that negotiations had been ongoing throughout the summer and that they hope to overcome the negative reactions to the first film, despite its $491 million worldwide gross. The film will be shot in 3D, as opposed to the rushed post-production conversion job on Clash of the Titans.

Dan Mazeau (The Flash) and David Johnson (Red Riding Hood) are writing the script for the sequel, based on a treatment written by Greg Berlanti (Green Lantern), Dan Mazeau and David Johnson.

Sam Worthington and Gemma Arterton are both expected to reprise their lead roles for Clash of the Titans 2. Our original report from June indicated that Warner Bros. was eyeing a January 2011 start date for Clash of the Titans 2, but that date may change.

We'll be sure to keep you posted with any more Clash of the Titans 2 news as soon as more information comes in.

Wrath of the Titans was released March 30th, 2012 and stars Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Ralph Fiennes, Edgar Ramirez, Toby Kebbell, Rosamund Pike, Bill Nighy, Danny Huston. The film is directed by Jonathan Liebesman.

Sources: Heat Vision Blog

Share this story yet?

0 0 0 0 0


Comments (26)

  1. Cyn

    Thank god they got rid of him. He made a mess out of it.

    Gemma F'ing Arterton. God, I'm really starting to dislike her.

    4 years agoby @cyn-de-harvenFlag

  2. the Narrator

    Well, after seeing how Battle: Los Angeles is looking, I am liking the idea of this sequel more.

    4 years agoby @narratorFlag

  3. Emmytt

    *slams head into wall*

    5 years agoby @emmyttFlag

  4. T.Clark

    Well, in order to hate it, we had to see it first.

    5 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  5. RojoDiablo

    $491 million dollars is a whole lot of cheddar for a film everyone seems to hate so much.

    5 years agoby @rojodiabloFlag

  6. Summit10

    We have spoken!!! :P

    5 years agoby @summit10Flag

  7. Goodbye

    @Birddiggler:I am in agree completely.Thats why the movie was so crappy because they didnt stick to the the story of Perseus(Sorry if I spelled the name wrong).Thats also what irked me about Percy Jackson and the Olympians.I've read the books and the first part did not have a single bit of the book in it.

    5 years agoby @drifter49Flag

  8. Birddiggler

    this is what pisses me off about Hollywood! this movie should have been 160-180 minutes long! been an EPIC that a movie studio should be proud of and be remembered for all time. but NO lets get about half the story right to the telling of the mythological tale. then give it a limited budget and make it only 106 minutes long and if does good will make a sequel and make more money. it should have been done right the first time!

    the remake was good but it could have been a lot better if the movie execs weren't so stoopid and spent the money right the first time and made it an "EPIC" instead of a little above average movie!

    5 years agoby @birddigglerFlag

  9. Diaigma

    Why no need, or why are they making this?

    5 years agoby @diaigmaFlag

  10. DoubleR0522

    why ???

    5 years agoby @doubler0522Flag

  11. Diaigma

    No need. No need. No need! :P

    5 years agoby @diaigmaFlag

  12. Worth5Bucks

    What?! This is ridiculous. This movie doesn't deserve a sequel, it didn't even deserve a remake. Even the original wasn't even that good. The problem is there was never much to work with.

    5 years agoby @mattbierwagenFlag

  13. T.Clark

    I won't be interested in this until I read reviews. I hated the remake.

    5 years agoby @insertusernamehereFlag

  14. Err

    yeah im with ed here, i finally saw the remake this past weekend and after hearing all the complaints about it i expected a train wreck, but it was totally entertaining. i kept looking around for my popcorn and them remembering i wasn't at a theatre.

    5 years agoby @err2005Flag

  15. justinishulk

    What happen to Louis Leterrier?

    5 years agoby @justinishulkFlag

  16. ed_wood

    I'm up for it I kind of liked the remake.

    5 years agoby @ed-woodFlag

  17. WiseGuy

    A sequel is unnecessary, heck the remake was even more unnecessary and it sucked. So, not really lookin' forward to this.

    5 years agoby @zgcorleone072Flag

  18. Spongebob_Boxofficepants

    why make this is there something worse than Hades?

    5 years agoby @spongebob-boxofficepantsFlag

  19. fanboy

    well the first one was a big let down for me, so i hope they make the squeal alot better than the first. with a new director and new writers then that shouldnt be a problem

    5 years agoby @fanboyFlag

  20. Bane5000

    meh...next movie

    5 years agoby @bane5000Flag

  21. incmob

    and i might add, that the first film was a huge letdown for me personally.

    5 years agoby @incmobFlag

  22. incmob

    yet another film... that does not need a sequel *sigh*

    5 years agoby @incmobFlag

  23. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    i don't know why a sequel is in the works, so, I hope it turns out ok,....:p

    5 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  24. Cripple

    I thought the remake was really entertaining and fun, I am up for a sequel.

    5 years agoby @crippleFlag

  25. Dan

    Why is this getting a sequel?...

    5 years agoby @dan1Flag

From The Web