BOX OFFICE BEAT DOWN: ‘Immortals’ Wins the Weekend with $32 Million

‘Jack and Jill’ takes second place with $26 million and ‘J. Edgar’ debuts in fifth place with $11.4 million.


Sources: Box Office Mojo
Tags: Box Office

Share this story yet?

0 0 0 0 0


Comments (18)

  1. Corey W.

    Well the last 20 minutes was ok, but not enough for me to really like the film.

    3 years agoby @coreyFlag

  2. Corey W.

    Just saw Immortals. I didn't like it at all.

    3 years agoby @coreyFlag

  3. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    In a matter of days, Immortals will break even and begin making profits

    3 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  4. Fat_Jesus

    Tower Heist got significantly better reviews than J. Edgar?

    Oh, good Lord.

    3 years agoby @fat-jesusFlag

  5. m2

    Well at least that piece of s*** Jack & Jill didn't make #1. And as for J. Edgar I was a bit let down, overall it was just a decent film which for me I'll forget about it once award season comes around and unfortunately that includes Leo's performance that was great but not great great. Sorry.

    3 years agoby @m2Flag

  6. CelluloidDreams

    "Immortals" was ok ...I would give it a C+!!! Not much of a plot...tedious towards the end!

    3 years agoby @2movieguysFlag

  7. Replicant

    @ChiRep-1 Definitely. Even so, they can bash the film if they want, but DiCaprio's performance is still an Oscar contender.

    3 years agoby @felipe-11Flag

  8. SupernaturalFreak

    I can't believe J. Edgar only debuted in fifth. I went to see it and it was a great movie. Maybe there wasn't alot of action in it but it didn't need it. It was telling an intriguing story. Leo's performance was great but I also think that Armie Hammer as Clyde Tolson was amazing as well - not to mention kinda sweet. I really liked the slight love story between J. Edgar and Clyde. It was very interesting. I think Leo should get an Oscar for his performance - and I think Armie Hammer should get an Oscar or at least a nomination for his performance. Don't listen to those cynical reviewer hacks!!! J. Edgar deserves to be seen!!!

    3 years agoby @supernaturalfreakFlag

  9. ROFLitschristian

    Jack and Jill made $26 mil? Bummer...

    3 years agoby @ROFLitschristianFlag

  10. ChiRep_1

    @thedude-abides Agreed, it fell to the subject of "critical hype" meaning critics assumed this was a best picture contender and DiCaprio's performance as Oscar worthy.

    3 years agoby @ChiRep-1Flag

  11. The First Avenger: JohnnyBlaze

    Im officialy done with Society, The fact that Jack and Jill made any kind of money proves that consumers litteraly have NO BRAINS. F&%# you Sandler! and Your God forsaken hold on mindless idiots!

    3 years agoby @johnnyblazetb82Flag

  12. Replicant

    Really, society? Jack & Jill at #2?
    I can understand Immortals, Puss in Boots, Tower Heist, but Jack & Jill? You've really disappointed me this time.

    3 years agoby @felipe-11Flag

  13. thedude-abides

    Visually pleasing with little to no substance whatsoever? I could'a guessed this would be #1.

    And J. Edgar's 41% I find to be the victim of a hoity toity reviewer base with preconceived expectations of excellence solely because of DiCaprio's performance. 41% is ridiculous. There's no way it's that bad.

    3 years agoby @thedude-abidesFlag

  14. ejk1

    3% just makes me laugh.

    3 years agoby @ejk1Flag

  15. Ghostman

    Well, we didn't see that coming...hopefully this gives Henry Cavill more star power in anticipating Man of Steel :)

    3 years agoby @ghostmanFlag

  16. Bawnian©-Dexeus

    Least the wrong movie didn't make it number 1

    3 years agoby @bawnian-dexeusFlag

  17. Corey W.

    Cool. Didn't see either number 1 or 2 this weekend...yet. Seeing Immortals tonight and hoping Jack and Jill pops up online sometime this week.

    3 years agoby @coreyFlag

  18. Josh

    Is Paranormal Activity 3 the most profitable film of all time? It has to be up there.

    3 years agoby @shuabertFlag

From The Web